Well maybe a bit brash with the title, but this post is in response to the upcoming RFP season, share my experience in the response process, and get others thoughts about the same. Please take the time to share your thoughts as it’s very useful for the channel community to clearly understand how to deal with these labor intensive events.
This year my organization participates in several RFP responses in the content management and analytics spaces. From our experience RFPs are generated for the following reasons or combination there of.
1.) Satisfy due diligence and price shopping
2.) To gain market understanding and vendor landscape
3.) To use competition for the “fittest solution”
What scares us most about the process is an un-educated RFP creating outlandish un-educated responses. For example in the case of OCR technologies an RFP that asks for 100% accuracy and no verification with a vendor response confirming this possibility and guaranteeing it. Anyone who is experienced with OCR will realize this is an incorrect response in any case and would not attempt to claim such. We have seen such vendors win in such a case and in the end cause a very bad situation that is hard to get out of.
What does the channel think about RFPs? There are so many situations, some organizations welcome open communication prior to responses, others shut off all communication. Some organization understand what they are looking for and are educated to the solutions, others are not. In bids where there are several companies responding you get interesting situations like competing with customers, vendor consolidations, and unfortunately a handful of politics. Share your thoughts
- Chris Riley, Artsyl Technologies, Inc.